From a scientific perspective, the 'absurdity horizon' is influenced by evolving understanding of cognitive biases and technological progress. Humans are prone to normalcy bias, where current conditions are perceived as normal or good, even when warning signs are present, and status quo bias, a preference for the current state of affairs. Future generations, unburdened by these contemporary biases, will likely have a clearer, more objective view of our practices. Advancements in fields like AI, biotechnology, and material science could render many of our current solutions inefficient, ethically questionable, or simply primitive. Furthermore, scientific advancements routinely challenge existing paradigms. Just as germ theory replaced miasma theory, future breakthroughs in areas like sustainable energy production, health, or even consciousness might expose the fundamental flaws or unintended consequences of our current 'best practices.' What we see as cutting-edge or even merely acceptable today might be viewed as rudimentary or even harmful through the lens of superior scientific understanding and data.